Agricultural Engineering, Volume 45, Number 3


Petras Punys, Inga Adamonytė, Algis Kvaraciejus, Saulius Žilinskas
Aleksandras Stulginskis Universiti; Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service under the Ministry of Environment


Stage, discharge, flow velocity, and flow cross-section area data of the Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service gauging (hydrometric) stations (GS) was used for the assessment of hydrokinetic energy resources (on the basis of the Ne-munas river case). Close correlation of water level, discharge, velocity, and cross-section relations was identified during the investigations whereas GS water flow velocity histograms were compiled according to multi annual daily discharge cur-ves and mean cross-sectional velocities as well as discharge relationship. The his-tograms are based on theoretic probability distributions and data validation tests. The best compliance is that of extreme value distribution. Hydraulic and geometric characteristics of the river flow, defined by the hydrological method, were compa-red with the results obtained by the hydraulic model (HEC-RAS). The compliance determined was valid. Transposition of the relation among flow velocity, bed cross-section area, depth of the river and the discharge over the length of the river is not possible for the assessment of hydropower resources due to the poor correla-tion of the data. Hydraulic simulation, using the digital terrain model of the river bathymetry, is the main and the most precise method to assess the resources of hydrokinetic energy and select the most efficient location for the generation of hydropower whereas field measurements bear significance only for validation of the data.

Keyword(s): Hydrokinetic energy, discharge data of hydrometric stations, morphometric, hydraulic and stream power characteristics.


Assessment and Mapping of the Riverine Hydrokinetic Energy Resource in the Continental United States. Technical Report. Electric Power Research Institute, Alaska, USA. 2012.

Assessment of Canada’s Hydrokinetic Power Potential. Phase I Report. Metho-dology and Data Review. Canadian Hydraulics Centre, National Research Council of Canada. 2010.

Grabbe M. Hydro-Kinetic Energy Conversion: Resource and Technology. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Disser-tations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1025. Uppsala, 2013, 96 p.

Grabbe M., Yuen K., Goude A., Lalander E., Leijon M. Design of an experimental setup for hydro-kinetic energy conversion. International Journal on Hydropower & Dams, 2009, 15(5), p. 112–116.

Handbook of Hydrology. Ed. Maidment D.R. McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1993.

Jablonskis J. Lietuvos upių hidroenergijos balansas. Energetika, 2005, Nr. 3, p. 24–37.

Jablonskis J., Jurgelėnaitė A., Tomkevičienė A. Hidroenergetika aplinkos ap-saugos kontekste. Energetika, 2007, Nr. 3, p. 48-56.

Johnson J.B., Pride D.J. River, Tidal, and Ocean Current Hydrokinetic Energy Technologies: Status and Future Opportunities in Alaska. Alaska Center for Energy and Power, Alaska, USA, 2010.

Khan M.J., Iqbal M.T., Quaicoe J.E. River Current Energy Conversion Sys-tems: Progress, Prospects and Challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12, p. 2177–2193.

Leopold L.B., Maddock T. The Hydraulic Geometry of Stream Channels and Some Physiographic Implications. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 252, 1953.

Lalander E., Grabbe M., Leijon M. On the Velocity Distribution for Hydro-kinetic Energy Conversion from Tidal Currents and Rivers. Journal of Renewable Sustainable Energy, 2013, 5, 19 p.

Lalander E. Hydrokinetic Resource Assessment Measurements and Models. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1038, Uppsala. 2013, 70 p.

Lanerolle L.W.J, Paternostro C.L, Dusek G. A Numerical Assessment of the Hydrokinetic Energy Availability in Cook Inlet, Alaska. Proceedings of the 1st Marine Energy Technology Symposium METS13 April 10‐11, Washington, D.C. 2013.

Poška, A.; Punys, P. Inžinerinė hidrologija. 1996.

Previsic, M.; Bedard, R.; Polagye, B. System Level Design, Performance, Cost and Economic Assessment – Alaska River In-Stream Power Plants. Electric Power Research Institute, Alaska, USA. 2008.

Punys, P.; Kvaraciejus, A.; Vyčienė, G.; Darbutas, A. Aplinkosaugos teisės aktų, draudžiančių užtvankų statybą, poveikis hidroenergetikos plėtrai. Vandens ūkio inžinerija, 2010, Nr. 37(57), p. 84-94.

Punys, P.; Martinaitis, E.; Vyčienė, G.; Vaišvila, A. Neries upės tėkmės hidro-kinetinės galios charakteristikų vertinimas vienmačiu skaitmeniniu modeliu HEC RAS 4.1. Vandens ūkio inžinerija, 2013, 42(65), p. 61-71.

River Hydrokinetic Resource Atlas. Available at

Toniolo, H. Hydrokinetic Assessment of the Kvichak River near Igiugig, Alas-ka, Using a Two-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Model. Energy and Power Engi-neering, 2012, 4, p. 422-431.

Toniolo, H.; Duvoy, P.; Vanlesberg, S.; Johnson, J. Modeling and Field Measu-rements in Support of the Hydrokinetic Resource Assessment for the Tanana River at Nenana, Alaska. Journal of Power and Energy, 2010, Vol. 224, No. 8, p. 1127-1139.

Verdant Power Canada ULC., Technology Evaluation of Existing and Emer-ging Technologies – Water Current Turbines for River Applications, Tech. Rep. NRCan-06-01071, Natural Resources Canada; June 2006.

World Atlas & Industry Guide 2012. International Journal on Hydropower & Dams (IJH&D), Aqua Media International Ltd, Wallington, UK.

World Meteorological Organization. Guide to Hydrological Practices. Vol. II. Management of Water Resources and Application of Hydrological Practices. Geneva, WMO-No. 168, Sixth edition. 2009.

World Meteorological Organization. Manual on Stream Gauging. Volume II – Computation of Discharge. WMO-No. 1044. 2010.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Agricultural Engineering ISSN 1392-1134 / eISSN 2345-0371

This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License. Responsible editor: Dr A. Žunda.